6 ms·
I would be terrified to ever try and contribute anything to Linux, lest Linus yell at me and call me stupid. Seems like he does that in every excerpt that gets
by _bxg1 8y ago
I would be terrified to ever try and contribute anything to Linux, lest Linus yell at me and call me stupid. Seems like he does that in every excerpt that gets posted here.
- curun1r 8y agoThere's a form of survivorship bias at play there..."Linus responds sensibly" doesn't normally get posted to HN or anywhere beyond the actual forum where he responded, for that matter.
- _bxg1 8y agoThat's probably true
- ur-whale 8y agoWhy are you terrified by the idea of getting yelled at? What ever happened to sticks and stones?
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- fjsolwmv 8y agoHumans aren't robots.
- gizmodo59 8y agoI don’t think that should stop you. The worry comes much later when your contribution is significant. Furthermore, his rants are not absurd IMHO.
- _bxg1 8y agoI'm not a systems programmer so that wouldn't actually be the thing stopping me. That said, the validity of his rants would just make it worse...
- yongjik 8y agoThis is the open source equivalent of "We need a distributed system with sharded data replication to three regions in case we hit a billion users." If I ever get yelled by Linus on anything, I'll consider it great success.
- dozzie 8y agoNote that he only yells at people who have a long track of submitting patches, so he already has an established relationship with them. From what I hear repeatedly, he's polite and helpful towards the newcomers.
- _bxg1 8y agoFor the record I was mostly making a joke, everybody
- Senderman 8y agoJokes always have an additional truth payload. :j
- B1FF_PSUVM 8y agoYeah, and when Linus gets put to pasture and betrization [] becomes mandatory, we can all stop laughing. Probably laughing won't be allowed either, anyway, too aggressive. [] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_from_the_Stars https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Return_from_the_Stars
- throw2016 8y agoLinus is running one of the largest open source projects, he has probably communicated millions of times, everything is out in the open, but its only the handful of times he loses his cool that it gets posted here without context, without all his previous attempts to fix the issue, with people being difficult or obtuse, without context. This kind of out of context discussion that gives rise to comments like yours seems far worse than anything he has said. How many CEOs have managed companies out in the open for 15 years plus without ever losing their cool? There is no way to know as there is no transparency.
- cesarb 8y ago> Seems like he does that in every excerpt that gets posted here. That's because only messages in which he is yelling at someone get posted here. AFAIK, most messages he posts are neutral, but these are boring, so they don't get posted here. I just scrolled through LKML and found a random example of his normal tone (https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2852881.html https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2852881.html): "So none of the patches looked scary to me, but then, neither did earlier versions. It's the testing that worries me most. Pretty much no developers run 32-bit any more, and I'd be most worried about the odd interactions that might be hw-specific. Some crazy EFI mapping setup or the similar odd case that simply requires a particular configuration or setup. But I guess those issues will never be found until we just spring this all on the unsuspecting public. Linus"
- morpheuskafka 8y agoI don't know about you, but the organizations/people that I work with would not tolerate repeated yelling/anger at people trying to do their jobs, or in this case, contribute to a free community project, let alone to the point of becoming a stain on the entire project and a frequent topic of discussion around the world. You're quiet right that Mr. Torvalds is not in some permanent state of rage and does not respond inappropriately to all, maybe even most, messages on the lkml. But the fact remains that he and thus his project have a serious problem with hostility. I could understand flipping out on someone who was paid to do a job and didn't even try, someone who was deliberately introducing bugs, etc. But a simple disagreement between highly intelligent and dedicated FOSS developers never calls for this sophomoric behavior.
- Aloha 8y agothere is nothing fundamentally wrong with violent disagreement about technical issues, as someone who has been on the pointy end of the stick, you cant take it personally, its debate with people who have very strong feelings, about highly technical issues.
- mpweiher 8y ago> organizations/people that I work with would not tolerate Almost all organizations are highly dysfunctional...and in my experience particularly the ones that are intolerant of passionate discussion.
- toopsss 8y agoThis exact email was quoted by Rusty Russell at the 2002 OLS. I recall him making fun of Linus going to a school that offered black stars. This argument is between two people that had an actual working relationship outside the internet.
- newnewpdro 8y agoHaving been subscribed to lkml for years and generally followed the discussions at least at a casual level, this really isn't an accurate characterization of how Linus treats people in general. However, your attitude is kind of what Linus intends to instill in those easily deterred by such behavior. He's not interested in your contributions if you're going to be a thin-skinned child about the development process and ongoing maintenance. Your contributions won't be perfect, and he's not interested in having to waste time beating around the bush in telling you so.