3 ms·
Except the system they actually used, keeping the kids strapped to a stretcher, was not that far from the submarine idea. Just open, lighter-weight, and probabl
by jonhendry18 8y ago
Except the system they actually used, keeping the kids strapped to a stretcher, was not that far from the submarine idea. Just open, lighter-weight, and probably a bit more flexible. But you still have a kid placed within a container that the divers transport through the cave.
The main problem with the sub was that the rescue started earlier than expected, so there wasn't time to iterate. That isn't Musk's fault.
I wouldn't be surprised if the idea to use the stretcher arose after the sub idea was mentioned.
There's plenty to criticize Musk for (labor practices, hyping Autopilot recklessly), but it seems absurd to rewrite the events in Thailand in order to do so.
- jcranmer 8y agoThe stretcher system that was used is apparently a fairly standard piece of rescue equipment, and also looks to be smaller and more flexible. Given that experienced cave divers, including cave rescue divers, were involved with the rescue operation, saying that they needed Musk's sub idea to suggest use of a standard piece of rescue equipment is absurd and comes across as trying to steal credit.