2 ms·
"In the US, kids are seen at worst a nuisance and at best a personal luxury." That's nonsense. The US is all about children. That doesn't result in long term t
by maxxxxx 8y ago
"In the US, kids are seen at worst a nuisance and at best a personal luxury."
That's nonsense. The US is all about children. That doesn't result in long term thinking about their education or maternal/parental leave but children are not seen as a nuisance.
- wetpaws 8y agoJust try to tell it folks in bay area paying $2000-$3000 for childcare monthly.
- kimdotcom 8y agoI disagree, anecdotally, many of my peers with children recommend not have children and also regret not eloping.
- pfranz 8y agoI see both perspectives. As a culture that supports kids the US is way behind on maternity/paternity leave, childcare, leisure time overall, healthcare, higher level education. I see the increase in recent generations leaving religion has created a gap in social support, too (not sure how this maps to places other than the US). The US has a huge consumer culture for kids; suburbs are one way for kids to grow up, cheap toys and entertainment. Movies and entertainment have notoriously targeted PG-13 in recent decades because they're the largest audience (most free time and disposable income). I feel like in the US a century ago there were incentives to have more kids; need for labor, childhood mortality. These incentives have gone away and disincentives have taken their place; women entering the workforce, educating children until their mid-20s before entering the workforce as a career, and little things like the costs needed to raise a child[1]. We haven't really changed anything to improve those disincentives and the results speak for themselves. People are having fewer kids later in life. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breeching_(boys) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breeching_(boys)