Yep, totally agree. One problem is the way many articles are written. People want efficiency, but the relevant information is buried and scattered in the articl

Yep, totally agree. One problem is the way many articles are written. People want efficiency, but the relevant information is buried and scattered in the article full of pointless drivel. I'm not generally interested in how this journalist met the interviewee on a sunny day at a certain cafeteria, or that this interviewee wore this or that kind of dress, etc. First and foremost, I'd expect to get a very short summary on the whole thing in order to be able to decide if this article is worth using mental energy at all. But at the moment this kind of possibility of hierarchically expanding the content from high information density to low information density is not available. Edit: bad english