4 ms·
That's completely beside the point. Are we supposed to shed a tear for each of that 50 %? I can do that, but it won't help me, at all. On the other hand, I can
by klibertp 8y ago
That's completely beside the point. Are we supposed to shed a tear for each of that 50 %? I can do that, but it won't help me, at all.
On the other hand, I can use Dhall to generate Kubernetes/Helm configs, which will be more DRY, less duplicated, and not a pain to work with. I know that this would help me quite a bit, not only because I hate my current "DevOps" team members with burning passion and I'd enjoy watching them try to figure out what is happening (well, I'd at least add the source files to a repo, that's already more than they do).
- lifeisstillgood 8y agoYou are travelling in a worldwide convoy - a convoy across the globe travelling to the future. Those 50% are not just in pointless fortune x000 companies, but governments and charities trying and failing to do useful things with their infrastructure. The convoy has wagons with broken spikes, no horses and people berating them because they are not travelling as fast as the well maintained ones in front Shed a tear for those being carried by such wagons - they could reach the future so much faster if best practises were common practises And this from someone who believes in Schumpter
- KirinDave 8y agoI still don't understand why so many of your comments here are, "People are too stupid to..." This is an excessively negative argument, and has been used many times to push back against technologies that have subsequently shown to actually have huge traction. A great example of this that the Python community still makes: lambdas are too complicated.