3 ms·
As a vegetarian, this is pretty dumb. I could see not serving meat at the company, but not allowing people to expense it? That’s just weird and feels overly dra
by clay_the_ripper 8y ago
As a vegetarian, this is pretty dumb. I could see not serving meat at the company, but not allowing people to expense it? That’s just weird and feels overly dranconian. If they are so concerned with environmental impact, do their other company policies extend this level of control? (Require carbon neutral transport, environmentally friendly electronics? What about building materials? Furnishings?). I don’t think like they are going to convert anyone to vegan/vegetarian this way, and probably encourage the opposite.
- walrus01 8y agoI give it six months until they get sued by a Muslim employee. Culturally and religiously eating meat is pretty much required in Pakistan.
- themarkn 8y agoThe article seems to suggest that religious needs etc would be met.
- mayankkaizen 8y agoThat is a weird comment. I mean I am Indian and know plenty of Muslims. In fact some of them are my closest pals. I understand they eat meat regularly but I don't understand how eating meat regularly is required? As a matter of fact, I have lived with 2 muslim guys for 4 years and I never felt like they feel the need to eat meat. All those years, they ate veg food (except when they visited their home).
- PhasmaFelis 8y agoFrom TFA: > Individuals requiring "medical or religious" allowances are being referred to the company’s policy team to discuss options.