Our health is at risk because the EPA is choosing not to take scientific publications at face value with not even the most basic way to check work? Have the au

Our health is at risk because the EPA is choosing not to take scientific publications at face value with not even the most basic way to check work? Have the authors of this article actually confirmed that this would include non-anonymized data unfit for public consumption? Added: The actual document does not specify "raw data", it is much more specific about what data they expect. > The proposed regulation provides that, for the science pivotal to its significant regulatory actions, EPA will ensure that the data and models underlying the science is publicly available in a manner sufficient for validation and analysis. "A manner sufficient for validation and analysis" is a completely different standard than "all the data the study produced".