4 ms·
I can’t quite figure this out either. The only thing that I would call meddling was their propaganda campaign. We shouldn’t care about the leaked emails. If the
by lawnchair_larry 8y ago
I can’t quite figure this out either. The only thing that I would call meddling was their propaganda campaign. We shouldn’t care about the leaked emails. If the RNC had their mail spool dumped, Dems wouldn’t give a shit about this and would be saying that Republicans are just mad that they got caught.
- creato 8y agoWe don't have to imagine what a Dem campaign would do in a comparable situation: https://www.nytimes.com/2000/09/14/us/the-2000-campaign-the-debate-gore-aide-receives-then-lets-go-of-hot-potato.html https://www.nytimes.com/2000/09/14/us/the-2000-campaign-the-...
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- SlowRobotAhead 8y agoWow man, a puff piece article written directly before an election of how good and noble one candidate is. Not exactly hard hitting proof there. Not even counting that the DNC of 2000 is the same in 2018. Or that Hillary was as good (or bad) a candidate as Gore. Edit: I think a more fair reference would be looking at Clinton's past to see if there was anything ever questionable or sketchy. Like for instance... Did Clinton ask CNN's Donna Brazil to not send any more debate questions that would be asked later that week? No, she didn't.