so i think your definition is couched in the political (as opposed to, say, the philosophical), and that leads into the identity politics that russell argued ag

so i think your definition is couched in the political (as opposed to, say, the philosophical), and that leads into the identity politics that russell argued against. regardless, why confine liberalism as simply encompassing the individual end of the individual<—-—>collective freedoms spectrum? it seems that liberalism could encompass all of these freedoms as well as russell’s definition, no?