3 ms·

This case will NEVER go to trail and that's the point of Mueller filing it. He knows he has to get someone for something and indicting 12 Russians for crimes he

by g0dg0d 8y ago

This case will NEVER go to trail and that's the point of Mueller filing it. He knows he has to get someone for something and indicting 12 Russians for crimes he can't ever prove is a win for his team. What I'd like to see is the proof that these Russians ACTUALLY did the hacking. How do we know that THESE specific individuals committed these crimes? We don't, Mueller won't/can't prove that but that's the point. It's charge anyone for anything at this point.

manyoso 8y ago
Mueller did not bring this indictment. He presented the evidence to a Grand Jury of your fellow citizens. Those fellow citizens saw enough evidence to convince them to return the indictments. If the individuals indicted ever stand for the crimes they are alleged to have committed, then we will see the evidence as it will be a public trial albeit with any evidence that will reveal national security secrets redacted from public view. This is exactly how our justice system is supposed to work.
WrathOfJay 8y ago
What if there is evidence that they, in fact, did this? Everyone should be very concerned about this, whether the outcome played in favor of or damaged your particular party's side. This would be an attack on our democracy from a foreign government. How Trump handles this news is going to be very telling on where his loyalties are (beyond just himself).
- flyingcircus3 8y ago
  The person you're responding to has no desire to enter any logical debate. Their entire calculus is that they need Trump to deliver what he's sold them on. There is no coherence to any two of their points, it's simply "any port in the storm". Any piece of information that might lead toward Trump not completing his plan is completely rejected on principle. Thus, even though they aren't going to answer your question, I can. There is no evidence that is going to satiate a troll. The only tool a troll has is to spread doubt.

by g0dg0d 8y ago

manyoso 8y ago

Mueller did not bring this indictment. He presented the evidence to a Grand Jury of your fellow citizens. Those fellow citizens saw enough evidence to convince them to return the indictments. If the individuals indicted ever stand for the crimes they are alleged to have committed, then we will see the evidence as it will be a public trial albeit with any evidence that will reveal national security secrets redacted from public view. This is exactly how our justice system is supposed to work.

WrathOfJay 8y ago

What if there is evidence that they, in fact, did this? Everyone should be very concerned about this, whether the outcome played in favor of or damaged your particular party's side. This would be an attack on our democracy from a foreign government. How Trump handles this news is going to be very telling on where his loyalties are (beyond just himself).

flyingcircus3 8y ago
The person you're responding to has no desire to enter any logical debate. Their entire calculus is that they need Trump to deliver what he's sold them on. There is no coherence to any two of their points, it's simply "any port in the storm". Any piece of information that might lead toward Trump not completing his plan is completely rejected on principle. Thus, even though they aren't going to answer your question, I can. There is no evidence that is going to satiate a troll. The only tool a troll has is to spread doubt.