2 ms·

Implying that systemd is somehow the root-cause for this performance disparity strikes me as ridiculous. I've noticed a pattern over the years with anyone spel

Implying that systemd is somehow the root-cause for this performance disparity strikes me as ridiculous. I've noticed a pattern over the years with anyone spelling systemd as SystemD: They tend to not really know what the hell they're talking about with regards to systemd, while possessing significant bias against the project, actively searching for reasons to disparage it.

snorrah 8y ago
Feel free to illuminate us with what the possible performance discrepancy is instead caused by ?
- viraptor 8y ago
  Could be phrased better, but they're not wrong: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17518518 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17518518
- newnewpdro 8y ago
  A kernel bug, that systemd exposes by attempting to utilize more of the kernel's newer features.
  - rleigh 8y ago
    Possibly, but it might simply be that systemd using the shiniest new features just for the sake of it is not the most performant or sensible approach.
    - jonathonf 8y ago
      When running Percona under systemd the EPYC system was getting 24% _more_ throughput.