> Why is representative democracy the best system for managing a repo? The most obvious reason (to me) is that it's sort of preposterous to think that all vote

> Why is representative democracy the best system for managing a repo? The most obvious reason (to me) is that it's sort of preposterous to think that all votes are equal. I've never even used Python. Should my vote be worth the same as Guido's when it comes to some technical decision? This is a problem in representative democracies as well, of course, but you've a little more protection. There's also the issue of practicality. Voting on issues is a time and resource intensive process. It's just impractical to have everybody vote directly on every single decision. > Can I fork your socialist utopia and form an authoritarian dictatorship? Well, of course! > I don’t see why this system would ever be beneficial to a real world government. I can't think of a less viable equivalency than attempting to equate a system government to an open source project's management model. - Nations have many orders of magnitude more resources than... Python - Practically speaking the vast majority of people can belong to only a single nation, whereas most developers probably used a handful of languages in the last 24h - Nobody asked to be born into a country, and most people on Earth can't simply choose a new one - The decisions made by nations are literally life and death for millions of people The relevant factors for determining the course of Python's governance model bear far more resemblance to your neighborhood restaurant's menu decisions than the ways in which governments are elected.