> where firearms result in tens of thousands of deaths a year > "I’d call a militia out to defend the server, Bundy-style," Wilson says calmly, in the first ov

> where firearms result in tens of thousands of deaths a year > "I’d call a militia out to defend the server, Bundy-style," Wilson says calmly, in the first overt mention of planned armed violence I've ever heard him make. I don't see why Wired sees fit to defame and misinterpret people, and misrepresent the facts on this topic. If they're so right, why not let the facts speak for themselves? Calling a militia out to defend the server is not planned armed violence, it's planned armed defence: not even the responding militia wants there to be any actual violence, if anything the armed militia decreases the likelihood of violence occurring (nobody's going to serve a forcible no-knock on a room full of armed men defending a mere library, and engaged in the commission of no offence).