3 ms·
Unless of course the hiring process has a systemic flaw and there's an entire class of people that are being rejected that could be game changing. (I actually
by andybak 8y ago
Unless of course the hiring process has a systemic flaw and there's an entire class of people that are being rejected that could be game changing.
(I actually don't have an axe to grind here - it's certainly not related to any obvious grouping - I just wonder if interview and selection might be so deeply flawed that a the occasional random lottery injection might improve the overall result.)
- rrdharan 8y agoThere are effectively random lottery injections via acquisition/acquihires. Source: I was/am one.
- s2g 8y agoI thought they made people re-interview?
- rrdharan 8y agoThey do but it’s at least a lighter schedule. I also think the criteria are different. i.e. I believe when evaluating the results it’s more strongly biased to avoid false negatives unlike the regular process which is more about avoiding false positives. Or maybe I just have impostor syndrome, who can say...