5 ms·

Not really. Most firefighters in the US are volunteer, so not enough pride to pay people to do it. In big cities, it's more of an internal camaraderie thing. T

Not really. Most firefighters in the US are volunteer, so not enough pride to pay people to do it. In big cities, it's more of an internal camaraderie thing. They live together, cook together, shop together, etc. A lot prefer being at the station with their 'brothers' to being at home.

mc32 8y ago
Many volunteer firefighters are just as well provisioned and with as many amenities as fully paid ones, at least in many suburbs.
reaperducer 8y ago
Most firefighters in the US are volunteer, so not enough pride to pay people to do it. Having a volunteer fire department does not mean there isn't pride. In fact, it can be argued the opposite -- Volunteer departments mean the citizens take enough pride in their brigade that they get directly involved in it, rather than farming it out as a civil service.
- pastor_elm 8y ago
  I think there is a big difference between the pride of individual being a firefighter (many people feel this and are willing to take the job with no pay or benefits even though firefighters are at risk for a whole range of occupational induced diseases) and the pride a community feels for an organization and their willingness to support them.
  - toomuchtodo 8y ago
    Some communities simply can’t afford to pay a fire brigade, hence a volunteer squad where everyone chips in.
    - pastor_elm 8y ago
      They can pay for it. They just don't want to increase taxes.
      - toomuchtodo 8y ago
        The tax base just isn't there sometimes. I've seen community budgets where everyone is hanging on by a thread. Not quite as bad as Native American reservations, but up there.
        emodendroket 8y ago
        Sure, many communities have that problem. But I think there are at least some where that would not be the case anymore if they raised their tax rates.
        JackCh 8y ago
        There are plenty of communities in America that have professional fire departments. Particularly cities where there is actually a tax base to support it. You'll find volunteer fire departments in pretty much any working class town where the manpower is capable and willing but the money is lacking.
        emodendroket 8y ago
        Yes, I am aware. But, again, the money is lacking in part because there is no will to raise taxes.
        arkades 8y ago
        Absolutely. Look at Long Island, NY. There are a number of communities with the wealth to transition to professional fire brigades, but the property taxes are already high and the political leanings run conservative.
    - cascom 8y ago
      For most small towns I think its more the fact that a fire is a pretty rare occurrence (a couple call outs a year with a major fire every few years) so its more of a cost/benefit decision - they're willing to add ~5 min to the response time for a rare event in order to deploy $1m+/year to other higher priority areas
      - gsnedders 8y ago
        In the UK the majority of firefighters are on retainers, and will spend a few hours a week training, but otherwise just rely on pagers. They're paid a few thousand per year plus hourly and callout rates.
        cascom 8y ago
        Which is the model for volunteer firefighters in the US (minus the hourly compensation/annual stipend) otherwise its essentially the same.
Spooky23 8y ago
Around here, the state government subsidizes volunteer companies for equipment and facilities, and the fire district can bond with public votes that attract fewer voters than school board elections. My dad lives in a town with 250 annual callouts, a $10M firehouse and two $300k fire engines. In the city that I live in a few miles away with a paid department, the firehouse next door does like 6,000 calls a year with a 2005 truck with 200k miles on it.
freehunter 8y ago
Volunteer firemen in the US certainly do get paid, or at least reimbursed. They're not working for free. And places with volunteer fire departments aren't volunteer because there's no pride, they're volunteer because there aren't enough fires to warrant paying people full-time to sit around doing nothing. They're on-call, and they get paid to respond to fires. In the meantime, they go to their normal job that also pays them money.
- nkurz 8y ago
  I think you are overgeneralizing. In the two places I'm familiar with, rural North Carolina and rural Wisconsin, "volunteer firemen" are truly unpaid volunteers. You are right that others are paid for their time, but it's not universal. Here's a Straight Dope thread that talks about the different approaches in some different places: https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=658416 https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=658416

mc32 8y ago

Many volunteer firefighters are just as well provisioned and with as many amenities as fully paid ones, at least in many suburbs.

reaperducer 8y ago

Most firefighters in the US are volunteer, so not enough pride to pay people to do it. Having a volunteer fire department does not mean there isn't pride. In fact, it can be argued the opposite -- Volunteer departments mean the citizens take enough pride in their brigade that they get directly involved in it, rather than farming it out as a civil service.

pastor_elm 8y ago
I think there is a big difference between the pride of individual being a firefighter (many people feel this and are willing to take the job with no pay or benefits even though firefighters are at risk for a whole range of occupational induced diseases) and the pride a community feels for an organization and their willingness to support them.
- toomuchtodo 8y ago
  Some communities simply can’t afford to pay a fire brigade, hence a volunteer squad where everyone chips in.
  - pastor_elm 8y ago
    They can pay for it. They just don't want to increase taxes.
    - toomuchtodo 8y ago
      The tax base just isn't there sometimes. I've seen community budgets where everyone is hanging on by a thread. Not quite as bad as Native American reservations, but up there.
      - emodendroket 8y ago
        Sure, many communities have that problem. But I think there are at least some where that would not be the case anymore if they raised their tax rates.
        JackCh 8y ago
        There are plenty of communities in America that have professional fire departments. Particularly cities where there is actually a tax base to support it. You'll find volunteer fire departments in pretty much any working class town where the manpower is capable and willing but the money is lacking.
        emodendroket 8y ago
        Yes, I am aware. But, again, the money is lacking in part because there is no will to raise taxes.
        arkades 8y ago
        Absolutely. Look at Long Island, NY. There are a number of communities with the wealth to transition to professional fire brigades, but the property taxes are already high and the political leanings run conservative.
  - cascom 8y ago
    For most small towns I think its more the fact that a fire is a pretty rare occurrence (a couple call outs a year with a major fire every few years) so its more of a cost/benefit decision - they're willing to add ~5 min to the response time for a rare event in order to deploy $1m+/year to other higher priority areas
    - gsnedders 8y ago
      In the UK the majority of firefighters are on retainers, and will spend a few hours a week training, but otherwise just rely on pagers. They're paid a few thousand per year plus hourly and callout rates.
      - cascom 8y ago
        Which is the model for volunteer firefighters in the US (minus the hourly compensation/annual stipend) otherwise its essentially the same.

Spooky23 8y ago

Around here, the state government subsidizes volunteer companies for equipment and facilities, and the fire district can bond with public votes that attract fewer voters than school board elections. My dad lives in a town with 250 annual callouts, a $10M firehouse and two $300k fire engines. In the city that I live in a few miles away with a paid department, the firehouse next door does like 6,000 calls a year with a 2005 truck with 200k miles on it.

freehunter 8y ago

Volunteer firemen in the US certainly do get paid, or at least reimbursed. They're not working for free. And places with volunteer fire departments aren't volunteer because there's no pride, they're volunteer because there aren't enough fires to warrant paying people full-time to sit around doing nothing. They're on-call, and they get paid to respond to fires. In the meantime, they go to their normal job that also pays them money.

nkurz 8y ago
I think you are overgeneralizing. In the two places I'm familiar with, rural North Carolina and rural Wisconsin, "volunteer firemen" are truly unpaid volunteers. You are right that others are paid for their time, but it's not universal. Here's a Straight Dope thread that talks about the different approaches in some different places: https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=658416 https://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=658416