3 ms·
Core 2 Duo? You're aiming way too high here. A RISC-V core that can compete with a Cortex A9 or a Snapdragon 820 would be exceptional.
by freeone3000 8y ago
Core 2 Duo? You're aiming way too high here. A RISC-V core that can compete with a Cortex A9 or a Snapdragon 820 would be exceptional.
- tonysdg 8y agoMaybe a Pentium IV then? I don't think RISC-V -- or any processor really -- gets taken seriously in the desktop/laptop space unless it can compete with one of Intel's earlier chips.
- jononor 8y agoUnlikely that anyone will even try to target desktop/laptop market with a RISC-V CPU, it is a very established market without much future growth. The plays will be in embedded devices, especially areas which requires pheripherals with tight integration with the CPU, this is where an open and extensible ISA can be a significant benefit. Examples today are controllers inside SSDs/SDcards. In future maybe also microcontrollers with integrated machine/deep learning co-processors.
- lkcl 8y agononsense. rocket-chip has been taped out at 45nm and achieved 1.5ghz, years ago. india's shakti core is going into 20nm and as a 6-stage pipeline will run at 2.5ghz. as that one uses only 120mW, even 16 2.5ghz cores would only consume around 3 watts (!!!). caveat of course: the L1/L2 cache power consumption isn't included in that figure, but, crucially, with the Compressed Instructions reducing cache misses by 20-25% that's equivalent to having approximately double the I-cache size. basically by a fresh start they're on to a winner.