4 ms·
No, it's generally "Copyright <name>" to explain where the license is coming from, but a copyright license is the exact opposite of "all rights reserved".
by ChristianBundy 8y ago
No, it's generally "Copyright <name>" to explain where the license is coming from, but a copyright license is the exact opposite of "all rights reserved".
- blattimwind 8y agoNo, not really. The phrase itself has no legal significance any more, anyway, but even if it did, this would basically work like an ACL: Allow MIT terms Deny * # all rights reserved (implied) Am I using it under MIT terms? Allowed. Otherwise not.
- JdeBP 8y agoThat is not in fact true on either point. Some legal significance remained for a while, and it is not nor was like an ACL. * http://jdebp.info./FGA/law-copyright-all-rights-reserved.html http://jdebp.info./FGA/law-copyright-all-rights-reserved.htm...