3 ms·
From the article: However, some have argued these drops may be artificially low because participants knew the guaranteed income was temporary.[6] This represen
by tarr11 8y ago
From the article:
However, some have argued these drops may be artificially low because participants knew the guaranteed income was temporary.[6] This represents an important limitation to the knowledge of the impact of a guaranteed annual income; little is known about the long term effects on willingness to work.
- specialist 8y agoYour point? We shouldn't try UBI because initial positive results may not prove durable? I'm also struggling to understand how willingness to work, especially with our current labor glut, is more important than public health. --- I forgot to add: The sole concern I have about UBI in the USA (vs Canada) is our lack of universal healthcare. Single payer or otherwise. I can't imagine UBI working without it.