3 ms·
We had no poach deals with other franchises when I was a hiring manager. The idea was: 1. Other franchise owners knew each other by name and would call each ot
by igneo676 8y ago
We had no poach deals with other franchises when I was a hiring manager. The idea was:
1. Other franchise owners knew each other by name and would call each other up when they found their employee were hired by us. Enough harassment and you tire or worry that they won't help you in situations like running out of product or selling/purchasing stores from you
2. The kind of person looking to sell themselves often were often trouble and weren't what we were poking for. Signal to noise ratio was terrible in these situations
3. Since we paid so little, a wage war was a sort of Mutually Assured Destruction and good employees were worth much more than we were paying them. Why chance that?
4. Training a new employee was a lot of time and money - a week with another employee just to make them somewhat competent in their station and a month so they could reliably hold their own. Then do that for every station the employee was expected to work (5 - 6 for a non-kitchen employee)
I only "poached" if I was sure I would withstand a tongue lashing from the office and I was almost told to stop the hiring process on one after I had offered them a job.
Glad I'm out of that industry
- lovich 8y agoHow is that not illegal collusion? The franchises have set themselves up as separate companies for their own benefit, but when it would benefit employees they work in concert?
- TheCoelacanth 8y agoPoint #3 is exactly why the law should have zero tolerance for this type of agreement.