> It's easy "you can't hire employees" and enforce it I wouldn't say that's "easy" by any measure. It requires(/d) a large shift of public opinion and awarenes

> It's easy "you can't hire employees" and enforce it I wouldn't say that's "easy" by any measure. It requires(/d) a large shift of public opinion and awareness, enforcement is in many ways harder because there's less visibility. > I'm quite fine with the government knowing where my government registered, government licensed, government plated car is going. You're right. Most of us are. Are you ok with them implanting chips into you as a baby to track your every move? Assuming your response to that is "no" then you realize that the issue at hand is scope. There are limits to what we'll accept. > Do you have a phone? You're leaving records on every tower your phone connects to. Do you use WiFi? You're leaving records. Again you're confusing the principle at large and the scope at which it's applied. > Are you an illegal immigrant or a human/drug/weapon trafficker that is under investigation using a specific vehicle to commit your crimes? Yes? Then don't go to the mall. This is a reductive argument. When I talk about the scope above I'm talking about the impact it has on everyone.