4 ms·
iies indeed, vuhii can't vvue dgust use tvuo gliiphs for sounds that are "obvious" combinations of other sounds?
by ithkuil 8y ago
iies indeed, vuhii can't vvue dgust use tvuo gliiphs for sounds that are "obvious" combinations of other sounds?
- fyolnish 8y agoies indeed vuhai can’t vee just use tvoo gliphs Is a much more readable example I think.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- hannasanarion 8y agoYou don't need to invent new ones, English already has plenty of digraphs: gh, sh, ou, ie, ei, ae, oa, th, ng, gn, wh, ch, ph, kn, tch, ough, ti, zg, ci, wr, and qu.
- c4h8o3del 8y agoDon't act like English is anything close to having a proper syllabary.
- dahart 8y agoI’m curious how you got to your examples. Will upvote an honest answer. The ii is used for y, long i, and short i, and I don’t understand any of the vs, or why they would be obvious in these combinations, doesn’t v only make one sound in English?