2 ms·
I'm all for doing things "by hand", but this solution introduces a single point of failure. If the colo company has networking issues you'll lose all your traf
by stevekemp 8y ago
I'm all for doing things "by hand", but this solution introduces a single point of failure. If the colo company has networking issues you'll lose all your traffic.
And of course doing HA / load-balancing across data-centers is hard. Ideally you'd use haproxy to route traffic to two distinct backends - but if the proxy is down your traffic gets lost. Simpler solutions are possible, but to do it properly would require your own IP ranges/BGP etc.
(Some people use static sites and use DNS for failover, but I think we all agree that's a terrible solution.)
- apple4ever 8y agoThat's why you get one with multiple networks. AWS has had many outages too- more than a colo would have.