3 ms·
The story is the perceived loss of control over who can (and will) make guns. The thinking being that by publishing the info on the net a great many people who
by jsoc815 8y ago
The story is the perceived loss of control over who can (and will) make guns. The thinking being that by publishing the info on the net a great many people who wouldn't have otherwise bothered to figure out how to do so will now make guns. And of course, since the net isn't limited by geography per se, now the issue becomes one of international concern.
For the record, while I expect that there will be an uptick in interested parties, I don't think it will of epic proportions because at the heart of it, people are lazy.
I do, however, wonder how the gun manufacturers feel about this.
- smsm42 8y agoJust for an example, this is what happens when people need to make guns on the cheap in field conditions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sten https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sten Quoting: "the most basic model, the Mark III, could be produced from five man-hours of work". In any machine shop having as advanced technology as welding and metalworking.