At the root of this article is a complete lack of insight into what it means to compare apples with apples and oranges with oranges. One of the points made by

At the root of this article is a complete lack of insight into what it means to compare apples with apples and oranges with oranges. One of the points made by Mr Gans is: When I’m going to catch a ball, I predict the physics of where it’s going to end up. I have to do a lot of other things to catch the ball, but one of the things I do is make that prediction. You do yourself a disservice sir - there is no AI on earth that could possibly match your ability to determine where a ball will land and work out how to catch it (one hand or two, over or under), whilst teetering on a pair of legs or perhaps diving. You may also be about to land in water and be working out how to deal with that as well at the same time. If you are diving you will also be making some horrifically complicated calculations that will ensure that you don't snap your neck or ribs and land in one piece. You may do that whilst daydreaming about something else. "AI" is making some wonderful advances. Doing most of the stuff that we do routinely is not one of them. For starters an "AI" doesn't have a body!