This is everywhere in academia. Peer review is like the goggles in the face of a seemingly neverending wave of BS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juFZh92MUOY h

This is everywhere in academia. Peer review is like the goggles in the face of a seemingly neverending wave of BS: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juFZh92MUOY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juFZh92MUOY Honestly who cares about these papers in the case of ML though? Its not like running other experiments where you cant check it yourself without spending $100k. Just share the code and explain it in a blog or readme. Its usually some pdf with equations no one is solving, proofs based on assumptions that dont apply to my situations, and some cherry picked overfitting of the cv.