4 ms·
You can't see the imagery when just listening to the music. There's no message in the music, just the YT video. If you like the music, so what? No need to be a
by fein 8y ago
You can't see the imagery when just listening to the music.
There's no message in the music, just the YT video. If you like the music, so what? No need to be ashamed.
A lot of the fashwave stuff sounds great, and no one is going to know why it's considered "bad" by listening.
- selimthegrim 8y agoThe Trumpwave/fashwave stuff is often other songs with only the music video changed c.f. the original Trumpwave video https://youtu.be/_k1zJV0DSvc https://youtu.be/_k1zJV0DSvc
- fein 8y agoCybernΔzi is an original artist. Another original artist is Xurious, who does sometimes include spoken word in the tracks (I recall at least one with Woes in it). I also wouldn't conflate Trumpwave with fashwave. Trumpwave imagery is of course popular with the TD crowd, fashwave not so much when they realize the associations. None the less, if you like the music, no need to self flagellate.
- selimthegrim 8y agoThe video in question though has its backing track by iamMANOLIS
- fein 8y agoI really didn't even notice the vice article had an embedded video (the wonders of video blocker extensions). I had assumed that the OP had gone down a youtube rabbithole much in the same way I discovered fashwave from looking into synthwave and retrowave. Edit: wait the Trumpwave video isn't fashwave, and isn't CybernΔzi. I assumed you were referring to the vice article.
- buckczechcatch 8y agoYeah but by sharing the music with others youre helping spread propoganda. Even juust watching the video probably helps it spread on YouTube with the recommendation algorithm. Gotta be careful.
- fein 8y agoYou're doing the same thing with Vice articles, and my goodness who are you calling your acquaintances if they are so easily swayed by imagery on a youtube video?