> But Kavanaugh argued that ISPs are like cable TV operators—since cable TV companies can choose not to carry certain channels, Internet providers should be abl

> But Kavanaugh argued that ISPs are like cable TV operators—since cable TV companies can choose not to carry certain channels, Internet providers should be able to choose not to allow access to a certain website For all the legal scholars: Would there be any legal distinction between signals which are broadcasted (as in traditional TV, whether digital or analog) and the structure of the internet having packets exchanged which ultimately contain two MAC addresses between two entities? Note: Not a network engineer so additional comments on domain specific nuances I may be ignorant of are welcome.