4 ms·
Social classes existed before; when revolutions occurred, the composition of each class and the composition of society into classes change. Just like there are
by raincom 8y ago
Social classes existed before; when revolutions occurred, the composition of each class and the composition of society into classes change.
Just like there are almost 50% of women in a society, the bottom social class (in terms of power, money, etc) is huge. So, whatever mobility one perceives is in the bottom class: moving from $15 hour security guard job to $150K jr dev job.
People from non-American countries recognize this. However, in America, the bottom class since WWII till late 1970's, had a nice job, pension, a home, two cars, with one spouse working; this created the illusion of 'class less' society in America.
When one says that there is no mobility, we are comparing the life of today with that of post-WW2 middle class era.
Even if we look at John Rawls, his difference principle does not eradicate classes. Basically, that principle in one version is same as "a rising tide lifting all boats"; in another version, it is fair to lift some poor boats higher than other boats, even at the expense of the latter.
- landryraccoon 8y agoOne reason I don’t think the caste system analogy holds is because you can’t overthrow Silicon Valley with a violent revolution. You can maybe destroy it, but it can’t be stolen. A caste system is arbitrary, a meritocracy is not. The article even admits this implicitly by saying that skills and training are necessary to be admitted to the inner party. Farmers may overthrow the hereditary monarchy because frankly the monarchs never had anything but historical accidents and tradition for their position anyway. But if farmers overthrow google who’s going to keep the servers running? Who’s going to fix bugs, manage projects, write code? The same people will end up running everything anyway, because they are the only ones who know how to do it.