3 ms·

Well-put! I can think of 100,000,000 better ways to spend $100,000,000.

• gamblor956 8y ago
  In a world where Color and Juicero have collectively received more than $100m to build fancy boondoggles for spoiled rich people, a tramway to the Hollywood sign, which would be a major revenue-generating tourist attraction on its own enjoyed and used by hundreds of thousands of people each year...is not a bad way to spend $100m. It's less than was wasted on those two embarrassments alone.
  • tacorama 8y ago
    Two colossal wastes of money is not a good reason for a third colossal waste of money.
    • gamblor956 8y ago
      We disagree on this being a waste of money. I see it is a valuable tourist destination promotion the LA area and generating taxable tourist spending in LA. It's basically just an investment in a long-term business. In the meantime, you see wasting $100 million on drug addicts who are voluntarily homeless because they refuse to stop using drugs as a more valuable way to spend money. (See what I did there?) LA already has $2.1 billion to spend on addressing homelessness and it hasn't spent it yet. It doesn't need another $0.1 billion from WB.