I really liked the author’s main “Suggestion for Improvements”. It's important to understand "why" and make reasonable claims rather than gouge for press covera

I really liked the author’s main “Suggestion for Improvements”. It's important to understand "why" and make reasonable claims rather than gouge for press coverage. > We encourage authors to ask “what worked?” and “why?”, rather than just “how well?”. … > Typical ML conference papers choose an established problem (or propose a new one), demonstrate an algorithm and/or analysis, and report experimental results. While many questions can be addressed in this way, for addressing the validity of the problems or the methods of inquiry themselves, neither algorithms nor experiments are sufficient (or appropriate).