4 ms·
> and if we eradicated the tiny handful that carry malaria, Zika, etc. it would only have positive results. for humans yes - which was his point. looking at th
by marliechiller 8y ago
> and if we eradicated the tiny handful that carry malaria, Zika, etc. it would only have positive results.
for humans yes - which was his point. looking at this from a human perspective is a problem. there are likely unknown consequences elsewhere in the food chain if we completely eradicate a species for our own gain
- sten 8y agoIsn't it the case that we just need to wipe out mosquitoes in an area long enough for malaria to die off? Didn't that happen in the US with DDT, the mosquitoes came back but the malaria stayed away. Or am I mistaken? Though frankly I'd be willing to risk them gone for good.
- mratzloff 8y agoNo, in this case. That was my point. Those individual species would have no impact on the overall ecosystem.