4 ms·
Do they support SNI? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527856 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527856
by tombh 8y ago
Do they support SNI?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527856 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527856
- vel0city 8y ago"Sorry, the latter piece of the patch does indeed appear to call the NSS SSL_SetURL which should trigger the SNI." So, according to your own link, yes it should support SNI.
- tombh 8y agoAFAIK it's not integrated yet. But anyway, I'm still wrong as lynx does support SNI: https://lynx.invisible-island.net/lynx2.8.8/features.html#improve_ssl https://lynx.invisible-island.net/lynx2.8.8/features.html#im...
- textmode 8y agoThe latest version of links does support SNI. I use several clients that do not support SNI and one workaround is to connect through a program that does support it, e.g. haproxy, socat, etc. Privacy/censorship conscious users may dislike SNI, SSL/TLS implementors are now trying to "fix" it, and in fact most SSL/TLS-enabled websites do not require SNI to be sent (popular browsers send it anyway). If requested, I can post stats on whether SNI is required for any list of websites. I have already done this a couple of times with the list all sites currently posted on HN: only a minority require SNI.
- jwilk 8y agoAccording the changelog, SNI support was added in links 2.10: === RELEASE 2.10 === […] Sat Jan 17 06:44:01 CET 2015 mikulas: Enable SSL SNI, some servers need it […]