3 ms·
According to [1], this is not true - it was intended to be an additive option. [1] https://www.bretfisher.com/is-swarm-dead-answered-by-a-docker-captain/ https
by abawany 8y ago
According to [1], this is not true - it was intended to be an additive option.
[1] https://www.bretfisher.com/is-swarm-dead-answered-by-a-docker-captain/ https://www.bretfisher.com/is-swarm-dead-answered-by-a-docke... from https://forums.docker.com/t/is-there-a-roadmap-for-docker-swarm/52581/9 https://forums.docker.com/t/is-there-a-roadmap-for-docker-sw...
- BretFisher 8y agoYep I wrote this, and it needs an update just months later. Lots happening. Even today a big PR was pulled in to improve the scalability of Swarm https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/37372 https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/37372 More updates here https://github.com/docker/swarmkit/issues/2665#issuecomment-399100372 https://github.com/docker/swarmkit/issues/2665#issuecomment-...
- sandGorgon 8y agohi, what do you think about the approaches of CiliumProject ? (https://opensource.googleblog.com/2016/11/cilium-networking-and-security.html https://opensource.googleblog.com/2016/11/cilium-networking-...). They do have a Docker plugin (but does not work seamlessly with Swarm), but they claim to use BPF for superior performance https://cilium.io/blog/2018/04/17/why-is-the-kernel-community-replacing-iptables/ https://cilium.io/blog/2018/04/17/why-is-the-kernel-communit... I think the Kubernetes and Swarm devs have generally leveraged IPVS as the next step from iptables. Any thoughts on going straight to BPF ?