Appreciate the simplicity of the test. With CRA-type debugging, my colleague thought that was how debugging was done with web dev in general (which would have b

Appreciate the simplicity of the test. With CRA-type debugging, my colleague thought that was how debugging was done with web dev in general (which would have been awesome!) He was fresh out of uni. A lot of console logging gives you a indicator that the person either doesn't know what is happening or that the person does not trust the CRA debugger. If (s)he doesn't trust such quality tools by default it is a sign of paranoia. They are too good to doubt as an initial user. It may have flaws, but ir's like doubting your compiler. It is probably you. If the person has a lot of logging you should ask hir why. Lacking experience in a given language is not a real objection to a quality developer. Lacking general programming ability would definitely be.