3 ms·
A few responses to that. 1. I'd echo from my first point, HN _never_ behaved as a "Refuge" the way you describe. If you're saying you'd like to see it changed
by existencebox 8y ago
A few responses to that.
1. I'd echo from my first point, HN _never_ behaved as a "Refuge" the way you describe. If you're saying you'd like to see it changed to function as such, I can simply disagree on a precedent of "that's not how it got to be the HN we know and love", but this will likely end up being a subjective disagreement. Politics may have become _more_ central, but unfortunately I think we're going through a period where that's true in many aspects of life.
2. In that same vein, HN has become something of a town-square for things tech. The "you can discuss it, just not here" is like when people say "well you can find things on the internet, google will just block them." Sure, that's factually true, but if it in effect cuts 95% of people out of ever seeing that subject matter, are you still really allowing discussion?
3. I fear that by not talking about it the "insane partisan bullshit" will become more normalized, because the adult voices in the room have stepped out. It's for us to make sure that the discussions don't become "Crap."
4. re: doom and gloom, unfortunately, "we have to sleep in the bed we made." If the broader world seems to be doom and gloom, I'm of the opinion that should be faced down without flinching. I'm not one to try and sugarcoat, fundamentally, that's just my personality, and again, one can philosophically go about life differently, but the way I look at things, an "only positive aspects of cool tech" discussion board would be disingenuous to the true scope of our impact, and lacking in much of the subtlety and interesting depth of discussion that made HN so compelling to me over the last 5-10 years.
- mindcrime 8y agoI'd echo from my first point, HN _never_ behaved as a "Refuge" the way you describe. Speaking as someone who has been here from every nearly the beginning, my perception is that it was much closer to that in the past (compared to today). I'm not one to try and sugarcoat, I'm not talking about sugar-coating anything. I'm saying that (pretty much) no one wants to be immersed in that stuff all the time. And in years past, HN seemed to be a site where one could mostly focus on tech/business stuff, without so much of the political baggage. I'd like to see that again. I find that I can get enough political discussion on Facebook / Twitter / meatspace. But, "different strokes for different folks" I guess. The site will ultimately be what the community makes it.
- existencebox 8y agomy perception is that it was much closer to that in the past (EDIT: On a second read of our discussion, we may even be just talking about slightly unrelated things, in that you're unhappy there's more politics period, and I'm trying to justify that by saying "it's the same subject matter, politics is just necessarily more a component". One could justifiably not care about that distinction; it just strikes me as meaningful) I don't think you're wrong persay, and while I've only been here over the last 6-7 years I've read the first hundred posts thousands of times due to HN being my defacto "social scraping test", and with a sampling of the first 10 stories, I'd stand by my assertion that unfortunately politics has been taking a heavier hand in things that previously may have seemed uncorrupted. to give some concrete examples (from the first 10 posts): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4 (Real estate costs in NY, still a common topic, but nimbyism/zoning is a central focus, largely political) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5 (Big-co aquisitions, now when discussed come alongside concerns re: consolidation, antitrust, etc) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6 (Forecasting software; while not specifically based off of private data, the discussion nowadays would likely pivot to that due to topical relevence) tl;dr, I don't necessarily agree with how much you may be implying the content has shifted, I just think politics plays a much stronger role in said content, or in our awareness of it, but again, this is perceptual and I'm not going to tell you "you're wrong" in having been there yourself. The site will ultimately be what the community makes it. Yup, and I try to limit my corrosion of this to trying to sway opinion softly. This all comes down to, for me, being more scared about LACK of attention/action, than if some threads go sideways.
- mindcrime 8y agotl;dr, I don't necessarily agree with how much you may be implying the content has shifted, I just think politics plays a much stronger role in said content, or in our awareness of it, but again, this is perceptual and I'm not going to tell you "you're wrong" in having been there yourself. Sure, and likewise I can't say that you're "wrong". It is somewhat subjective. In that sense, it's possible for us to both be "right" at the same time. Anyway, it's not - to me - a huge deal. There's a sort of change that I would like to see (I think), but I'm not so unhappy with the current state that I'm going to quit posting or anything. I mean, I'm here now, and in the end I'm pragmatic even when being so is a thorn in my own side. :-)