3 ms·
I stopped reading this article after the first example of Denver. I would not trust this article not being mostly propaganda because, if one looks in detail at
by njarboe 8y ago
I stopped reading this article after the first example of Denver. I would not trust this article not being mostly propaganda because, if one looks in detail at the first pair of photos, they are not close to displaying the same area. One third of the right of the 2014 photo shows where the grid changes directions with a very large N-S road. The one on the left from 1953 is shifted far to the left to where this part of Denver is not in the picture. It is hard to tell if even the scales (also not shown) of the photos are the same.
Edit: I decided to look at the rest of the photos after writing this comment and it is obvious in some of the other photos that the author somehow thinks it is useful to have photos of before and after that don't even overlap at all. Oakland, for example, has maybe 10% overlap with one showing mostly west Oakland and the other showing the Lake Merritt area. Maybe my browser is just not displaying things right. I'll interpret these strange before and after images that way and move on.
- zazen 8y ago> Maybe my browser is just not displaying things right. Yah, there should be a slider... Initial view shows left half of the area from before, right half from after, and you drag the slider to change the ratio. You might want to reconsider your browser choice if it also failed to display the "how to use" instructions at the top right.
- njarboe 8y agoThanks for the info. Works great in Chrome.
- brailsafe 8y ago"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. But don't rule out malice." - It's more than likely your choice of browser, these photos are very well aligned, but your hostility worries me.
- njarboe 8y agoI agree. "I'll interpret these strange before and after images that way and move on."