3 ms·
I use wmii with some minor customizations. I have one 30" full of 256-color rxvt-unicode windows and a smaller monitor running chromium. Generally communication
by enduser 16y ago
I use wmii with some minor customizations. I have one 30" full of 256-color rxvt-unicode windows and a smaller monitor running chromium. Generally communications (mutt, irssi) runs down the right edge of the 30" and then there are 2-3 columns of terminals running vim or zsh.
One killer feature of wmii is its use of 'tags' instead of virtual desktops. Windows can be assigned to multiple tags. I tend to have tags per task, so task switching is as simple as switching desktop tags.
- mickeyben 16y ago+1 for wmii ! I was using ion3 until 2008 and migrate to wmii at this time. I'm mainly using OSX now but I always have my wmii open in a virtual box.
- may 16y agoI miss Ion3. But I use dwm now!
- aphyr 16y agoI read that as "(256) (color rxvt-unicode windows)". Good god, man! ;-)
- mtmcannon 16y agoI used to love wmii, but I use xmonad now for the better multi-head support. I wish xmonad did tags like wmii though.
- sunkencity 16y agoI love wmii but it's a pity it's such a pita to build the plan9 stuff on osx. I prefer dwm that way - no pesky dependencies