3 ms·
Ah sorry, "A con of a con stands indirectly of support of the original pro" — better? :-)
by aidos 8y ago
Ah sorry, "A con of a con stands indirectly of support of the original pro" — better? :-)
- BeetleB 8y ago>Ah sorry, "A con of a con stands indirectly of support of the original pro" — better? :-) From a logical standpoint, not at all. From a social standpoint, it often does persuade people towards the pro. However, that is a known fallacy. It is a standard tactic in persuasion. From the movie "Thank You For Smoking": Joey Naylor: ...but you didn't prove that vanilla was the best... Nick Naylor: I didn't have to. I proved that you're wrong, and if you're wrong I'm right.