4 ms·
While there are nice features in fossil (and sqlite is fantastic), but it is not git compatible. If the code and artifacts were kept in git underneath then exch
by angry_octet 8y ago
While there are nice features in fossil (and sqlite is fantastic), but it is not git compatible. If the code and artifacts were kept in git underneath then exchanging code with other repos would be seamless. I don't understand why they rejected keeping tickets as files in a version control system (separate from the code), instead of blobs. It just seems unfriendly to manipulation by other tools. Philosophically, I like that git can be extended with small tools and modules instead of a monolithic executable.