3 ms·
I. Every once in a while, a new fad appears that is described by the infatuated as not a fad, just the way things are innately or intuitively supposed to be. T
by dictum 8y ago
I. Every once in a while, a new fad appears that is described by the infatuated as not a fad, just the way things are innately or intuitively supposed to be.
They never live up to this promise; the creative destruction along the way does pave the way for new and often better things, but it also destroys good tenets.
II. Why is it that those who make the best works of a certain style are usually the ones who are least willing to associate themselves with the "movement" around that style?
- ChefboyOG 8y agoYour second point is especially salient to me. I think you see it in all creative fields, from development to painting. People who are religious about a style—viewing the style's doctrine as an ends in and of itself, as opposed to a tool to help achieve their vision—tend to be the creatives no one remembers.