Seems to me you are into promoting conspiracy theories if they confirm your own world view, instead of withholding judgement until more information is available

Seems to me you are into promoting conspiracy theories if they confirm your own world view, instead of withholding judgement until more information is available. The article omitted the critical detail about which private API was used. I have received one of those letters before and they should contain those details. The fact that the article omitted that information makes it sound like they want to start a controversy instead of admitting a library developer probably made an easily remedied mistake. They were hoping for low-information-high-opinion internet audience to drive traffic.