It's worse than I thought. If you see my edit, I found that the author used their complete ignorance of the (strong/weak)/(static/dynamic) distinction to invent

It's worse than I thought. If you see my edit, I found that the author used their complete ignorance of the (strong/weak)/(static/dynamic) distinction to invent a claim of willful misdirection on the part of the Python community. Not only did they not do their homework on the topic, but they tried to portray people in a negative light to further their narrative. I find that incredibly dishonest.