3 ms·
I think one of the most optimistic things to notice about these two images is that Edge amazingly appears to be correct in both cases.
by bfrydl 8y ago
I think one of the most optimistic things to notice about these two images is that Edge amazingly appears to be correct in both cases.
- PeCaN 8y agoIt's pretty clear that Microsoft really took a close look at the specs when developing Edge, which is really nice. It also has the benefit of being the newest of the major engines.
- chrismorgan 8y agoActually, much of the time it comes down to what bugs people report. In a closely related area, IE and Edge both added spread distance rather than subtracting it on inner box-shadows until I reported it last year, then it was fixed in IE within a month: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/platform/issues/12515080/ https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/platfor.... In this particular case, they may have got the best of it because IE didn’t support outline-offset at all, and so when they implemented it they read the spec carefully. Edge is a continuation of IE. Large swathes of the renderer have been rewritten, but when you do find bugs in Edge they’re commonly shared with IE.
- chrismorgan 8y ago(Correction: fixed in Edge within a month; IE doesn’t get such fixes. Also “IE and Edge both” should read “both IE and Edge” for increased clarity.)