3 ms·
>>“There must be sufficient difference in the technology, or else Deere wouldn’t have wanted to acquire it in the first place." Or just to kill a competitor fo
by onetimemanytime 8y ago
>>“There must be sufficient difference in the technology, or else Deere wouldn’t have wanted to acquire it in the first place."
Or just to kill a competitor for next to nothing ($190 mil.) Together they have 80+% market share
This is the way it should be: well financed competitors fighting each other in courts, not a farmer vs John Deere.
- specialist 8y agoThere's some cliche about two wolves deciding how split the lamb...
- jessaustin 8y agoAs long as AGCO sells retrofits that give old, completely-depreciated planters the performance of new planters, they are firmly on the farmers' side.