4 ms·
Yes, this is equivalent to the statement "Mint succeeded and Wesabe failed", and not the reason it did. Mint reached probably an order-magnitude more people ul
by mikeklaas 16y ago
Yes, this is equivalent to the statement "Mint succeeded and Wesabe failed", and not the reason it did.
Mint reached probably an order-magnitude more people ultimately, so it isn't surprising that most of us haven't heard of wesabe.
- hoop 16y agoI disagree. I see mint reaching that "more people" as the reason why it succeeded, not a side effect