3 ms·
Not necessarily. That hypothesis rests on the basis that the market is still majority human-traded. Quote the article: High frequency traders, devoid of any re
by chipsy 16y ago
Not necessarily. That hypothesis rests on the basis that the market is still majority human-traded. Quote the article:
High frequency traders, devoid of any real demand from buyers of the futures contract, began to quickly buy and resell contracts "generating a 'hot-potato,'" the report said.
So this is algorithms-against-algorithms. I would wager that in intraday trading, human minds play a relatively small role, because mechanical methods break through the emotional barriers that plague pure discretionary trading. Most good daytraders will develop a signal system to guide them, even if individual trades use manual entries and exits.
- grandalf 16y agoMy understanding is that many algorithms float "test trades" to probe the other market participants (human and machine). It would be very costly for the algorithms to risk too much money on probing at an inaccurate price, so chances are the "hot potato" was not very deep at all. Nonetheless, your point stands that it could be an artifact of the traders expecting human-like decisions to underly the phenomena they saw. (it does seem implausible to me, but oh well)