3 ms·
"typing goo". Generally complaining about the methods used by someone with a novel-peer reviewed result and demanding further and further reductive summarizatio
by KirinDave 8y ago
"typing goo". Generally complaining about the methods used by someone with a novel-peer reviewed result and demanding further and further reductive summarization on your terms, defining said terms with phrases like "typing goo" is bad form.
Further suggesting a lack of credibility by suggesting press coverage should be in place is confrontational.
I lost my temper after you did these things a few times. I apologize.
And yes, it can get O(n) performance with Arbitrary length integers. These analysis exclude underlying comparison times.
- AlexCoventry 8y agoThanks for the feedback. > suggesting a lack of credibility by suggesting press coverage should be in place is confrontational. You edited out the context I was responding to, there. As I recall, you were originally explaining the "six years" in terms of it just being hard to get academic results into the mainstream. That seemed extremely unlikely for such a well-known result. I'm not bothered by your invective or personal attacks, but editing your comments so that my responses are out of context is pretty disturbing.
- KirinDave 8y agoI edited a cloned paragraph with a missing sentence that was accidentally added. I prepared that reply on mobile, and that can happen because you don't see scroll bars. The literal and figurative content weren't changed. I just removed duplication and improve the flow of the post.
- AlexCoventry 8y agoOh, BTW, I love types. I'm programming in OCaml at the moment. I just couldn't see the relevance.
- KirinDave 8y agoDid you try?