2 ms·
Indeed, the current transformations implemented by my obfuscator aren't particularly sophisticated, at least in comparison to some of the obfuscator's I evaluat
by dom96 8y ago
Indeed, the current transformations implemented by my obfuscator aren't particularly sophisticated, at least in comparison to some of the obfuscator's I evaluated such as Tigress[1] which can transform your code into a JIT.
But for the use case that my dissertation supervisor had in mind it works very well (gravypod outlines this use case well[2]).
Most of the work in this project was the creation of the underlying architecture for parsing and transforming C and C++ code. Now that this is done, implementing more sophisticated transformations should be fairly trivial.
1 - http://tigress.cs.arizona.edu/ http://tigress.cs.arizona.edu/
2 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17478448 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17478448
- konstmonst 8y agoI think this will not fly in court. Sourcecode is what you use to edit your program. Obfusicated code is like an assembler: an intermediate product. I think yoir use case doesn exist, at least here in Germany, edit: I misunderstood your use case, still I dont think obfusicated code is source code by definition
- askz 8y ago> I think yoir use case doesn exist, at least here in Germany that explains a lot.