3 ms·
That seems like a reasonably likely outcome, but this is the first time I've seen a claim that it is the entire goal. Do you have any pointers I could follow t
by mac01021 8y ago
That seems like a reasonably likely outcome, but this is the first time I've seen a claim that it is the entire goal.
Do you have any pointers I could follow to evidence that this is a deliberate strategy like you are describing?
- narrator 8y agoThe Economist is owned in part by the Rothschild family[1]. Yes, the same family who popularized central banking! Here's a good general overview of the plan [2]. You might think it's a good plan, or a bad plan depending on whether you like nation states or think they shouldn't exist. The same goes for why the economist would support a global carbon tax as thst can't be good for rich people. It's because it would fund a global government with limited accountability and drain national treasuries. The goal is globalism. The enemy is the nation state. They've been working on this for decades and they've failed a bunch, but they never ever give up. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economist_Group https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economist_Group [2] https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/03/24/a-rothschild-plan-for-world-government/ https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/03/24/a-rothschild...