> Does "something" have to be tangible and does it have to have a clear monetary value in damages IANAL, to be clear. But yes, fraud is generally defined legal

> Does "something" have to be tangible and does it have to have a clear monetary value in damages IANAL, to be clear. But yes, fraud is generally defined legally as deception for "gain", which is usually, but not always, denominated in money. Beyond that, like everything else in law, it gets complicated. Are you asking about civil or criminal fraud? Where? Also, even if you have a case that is technically civil fraud (say, I tricked you out of a dollar) or criminal fraud (I overstated my income on a mortgage application by a dollar), for small-dollar amounts you'll find you have a lot of difficulty actually bringing a case/no DA will touch it, simply because it is too small to waste court time on. Incidentally, that final point is why ATT and Comcast want to kill class actions. If the people they cheat can't band together, it is too much trouble for anyone to recover that $2.74 "Up Yours Because We Can ILEC Infrastructure Recovery Fee".